This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have removed the phrase "Moto Hagio's works and Keiko Takemiya's works in particular were very groundbreaking."
from the summary. This phrase should not be used without proper citations due to it possibly being opinionated.
It is hard to say if these to Authors, in comparison with other authors, were particularly more groundbreaking.
It may even be more suitable to create a section for them on this wiki page instead of simply referencing them in the summary.
Note: this does not mean that it is not true, just that it needs proof and sources before being reinserted
MishaGriego (talk) 02:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
