Talk:Shoot 'em up/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been assessed back then in 2009, as of now, September 29th 2021, it is no longer able to fit the criteria, due a lack of reliable sources and others like links, a rank i would suggest should be B or possibly A MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 15:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

• I'm not sure I understand your concerns with the article. What do you mean by "lack of reliable sources and others like links"? There are 100 sources used in the article and they all look reliable from a glance. By the way, the VG project does not use the A quality designator. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 08:53, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
• Person initiating the GAR has been indefinitely blocked. Am going to close this as a procedural keep. If anyone still thinks the article doesn't meet the criteria they can open a new GAR. Aircorn (talk) 05:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)