Talk:Shop floor

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shop floor article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Comment

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I am trying to tie up a lot of articles, especially those with English idioms. I agree this is more suitable for wiktionary but currently I would not be able to cite references for it and I thought it better than nothing. I believe it is marked with

so I was expecting it to be cross-linked but it is not a definitive definition (as indeed state) but it is better than nothing, I think. So OR is probably valid, well not OR but CN maybe, but SOMEWHERE this definition should stand.

Also, I think this article kinda falls more to an encyclopaedic entry than a dictionary one, since it gives (admittedly without citations) its use in daily life and its history. I could see it being either.

Best wishes SimonTrew (talk) 23:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic