Talk:Siah Bishe Pumped Storage Power Plant

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Siah Bishe Pumped Storage Power Plant article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Siah Bishe Pumped Storage Power Plant appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Siah Bishe Power Plant is to be both the first pumped-storage power plant and the site of the first concrete-face rock-fill dam in Iran?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Siah Bishe Pumped Storage Power Plant.

Wikipedia

Siah Bishe Pumped Storage Power Plant has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 18, 2013. (Reviewed version).

Dams Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Iran Low‑importance

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Siah Bishe Pumped Storage Power Plant/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Beagel (talk · contribs) 14:57, 17 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality, no copyvios, spelling and grammar:
The prose is well written and the spelling and grammar seem to be correct. There seems to be no copyright violations.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
The article's layout corresponds to MOS.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
The article contains a list of all references and, in general, references are presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. The only exception is the reference 7 which title ("News: IRAN'S FIRST PUMP- STORAGE PROJECT PROGRESS EXCEEDS 90%") uses capital letters instead of the normal style of writing. Also, this link is dead and should be replaced or archieved from the webarchive.

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
The article is well sourced. However, it probably would be better if instead of the large blocks with a number of references these references are place directly after the relevant sentences (e.g. first part of the 'Background' section).

C. No original research:
The article contains no original research
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
It addresses the main aspects of the topic. It would be helpful if the section or paragraph about environmental impact is added; however, it is understandable there may be not be RS about this.

B. Focused:
It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary details.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
The article is neutral.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
the article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
The image has correct copyright tag.

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
The image is missing alt. text per WP:ALT. Also, it would be useful to have an image about the plant itself but at the same time it is understandable that that kind of image may be not available.
Overall:
Pass
Good work.

Thank you for the review. I repaired the two references and added an alternate caption for the image. Not much information is available on the plant in English let alone a good free image.--NortyNort (Holla) 01:31, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic