Talk:Siberia (Lights album)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Former good article nomineeSiberia (Lights album) was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 21, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Siberia (Lights album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Will review this album shortly later. --K. Peake 09:37, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry but this is being failed already. The article is far from broad in its coverage, with the lack of a music and lyrics section as well as a promotion section. The commercial performance one is only two sentences long; I believe in its current state, the article will not be able to reach GA level of broadness after a week. Also, the prose is poorly written and the entire personnel section is unreferenced. Citations are included in the lead which violations MOS, while the release history section is laid out incorrectly too. Take a look at the good article criteria if you are unsure. --K. Peake 10:33, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply