Talk:Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri/GA2
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 16:06, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Ref #85[2] doesn't metion E3, whatever it is.I am happy that the manual supports this, in good faith.- I assume good faith for off-line sources.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Meets the criteria
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Captioned and with suitable non-free use rationales.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.
- OK, good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed.
- Pass/Fail:
1a: I have add a piped link to Electronic Entertainment Expo, but have kept the "E3". Tell me if you prefer that I expand that.
2a: This one's a little trickier. User:Vyeh was the one who added most of the sources, and he owned the manual, but hasn't been on in months. I removed the link in question, and I can remove the sentence as well, if need be. Your thoughts? Nolelover It's almost football season! 20:55, 20 March 2011 (UTC) 2a: