Talk:Sidney Gottlieb

Latest comment: 16 days ago by 73.189.88.136 in topic Lots united

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Locust Socks.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:19, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Reverts

edit

King Turtle, do not censor my information under the guise of a revert.--AI 09:45, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

King Turtle explained his revert, it was not unfounded so I am taking back this personal comment that I directed at King Turtle. --AI 21:49, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Attribution

edit

Please indicate the sources for your information - this is part of NPOV. Irmgard 13:32, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What content are you disputing?--AI 22:46, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Irmgard, this was one of the first articles I wrote and regrettably I didn't log the references I used. (Some of them were government documents, btw) I believe others who are familiar with the subject can also verify that this article does not contain innacuracies. Give me time and I will try to reference EVERYTHING written in this article. You can help verify it if you search for Gottlieb plus keywords in google.com. --AI 21:42, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Colonel?

edit

"Perhaps the timely death of Col Gottlieb. opened the door." - Col. L. Fletcher Prouty [1] Was Sidney Gottlieb a Colonel? --AI 23:34, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

He was never in the military, although his civilian rank would be equivalent to that of a Colonel or higher.--208.52.112.70 02:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Citations

edit

This article is in need of good citations to back up its many assertions— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.12.102 (talkcontribs) 23:09, 30 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

QJ/WIN?

edit

Gottlieb was not QJ/WIN! Accoriding to the Church Committe, Agent QJ/WIN was a foreign agent with a criminal background under Bill Harvey's Executive Action Program ZR/Rifle. The agent's name was never disclosed as per intelligence doctrine of keeping sources secret.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.88.178.70 (talkcontribs) 23:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vietnam

edit

"Less known was an operation within the CIA's Phoenix Program in Vietnam where a team of CIA psychologists performed mind control experiments on NLF suspects being detained at Bien Hoa Prison outside of Saigon. Through electrode implants in the brain, the prisoners were manipulated to attack each other with knives. The experiment was a failure and the prisoners were shot and their bodies burned." - is there any proof of this? Schrandit 06:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

@Schrandit: Ten years later, a portion of this remains uncited. I cannot verify, so I am going to remove it. - Location (talk) 03:44, 18 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Criminal Prosecution? War Crimes? Crimes Against Humanity?

edit

What's the academic significance of identifying his religion in the first line? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.244.116.61 (talk) 16:07, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia standard for biographical paragraph. (Jew as ethnicity vs. religion).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.134.164.108 (talk) 03:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

On a lighter note

edit

My parents were friends of the Gottliebs and folk danced at the Gottlieb's home for many years. Syd and his wife hosted the folk dance parties in their house just outside of Vienna, VA., home to another notorious intelligence community member, Robert Hansen. These parties all took place from about 1964-1975. Sometime in the mid 70's the folk dance club disbanded and my parents lost contact with the Gottliebs. When the story of the LSD experiments broke in the media, there was disbelief that Syd could have been involved much less the mastermind. Apparently he was a very sociable and likeable person - nothing like how he was described in the press. 129.83.31.1 (talk) 03:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

more info needed

edit

particularly "early years" and "final or retirement" years could use a bunch of work Ooma Huntress-Protectress (talk) 03:23, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Sidney Gottlieb. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:56, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The picture is not good. Please replace - easily found

edit

There are two very good pictures one should us instead. One in 3/4 pose when he retired in '75 and next to his lawyer in '77. You get a much better sense of what he looked like. Aperer1 (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

And the picture is certainly not from '77 when he testified before congress. He was about 55 then. Wrong pic. Aperer1 (talk) 18:39, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lots united

edit

There is a lot of material uncited. I don't want to take it all out. Probably some it could be cited. 73.189.88.136 (talk) 02:52, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply