Talk:Sieg (river)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by HouseBlaster in topic Requested move 4 September 2023
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 4 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Sieg (river). The result of the discussion was moved to Sieg River. |
Requested move 4 September 2023
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Sieg River. Unanimous agreement that a move is A Good Thing; NATDAB argument is stronger policy-wise. (closed by non-admin page mover) HouseBlastertalk 00:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
– No primary topic, see pageviews Hameltion (talk | contribs) 23:17, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Leaning support given the number of topics. I am not seeing any great significance to the river. BD2412 T 00:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nominator. Killuminator (talk) 11:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- Move to Sieg River per WP:NATURALDISAMBIGUATION. Rreagan007 (talk) 03:59, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Support this alternative, which appears to be a common phrase in English. Andrewa (talk) 12:08, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.