Talk:Siege of Avignon (1226)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Srnec in topic "Referencing and citation: criterion not met"
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Referencing and citation: criterion not met"
edit@Gog the Mild: Can you explain? Thanks, Srnec (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Srnec, certainly. I tagged it as of interest to the MilHist Project. I made no assessment judgement. The MilHist bot came along and assessed it as C. I assume that it was confused by the block quotes, it may have thought that the breaks immediately before them were paragraph endings with no cites; this is purely a guess. While I am here I am happy to upgrade it to B. A nice, and fascinating, piece of work. I hope that you intend to take it to GAN. Cheers. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- The Bot doesn't know about blockquotes. I suppose I could teach it. Another quirk is that the Bot thought the article was biographical, because it was categorised as being about King Louis VIII. (Also, but not in error, it reported that Beaucaire is a disambig, and that Choffel, Jones and Petit-Dutaillis are not used.) Gog is quite right about it being nice and fascinating, and I would encourage you to take it to GAN. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- The Bot has now been taught to recognise blockquotes. (It also rates the article as GA-worthy.
) Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:47, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- The Bot has now been taught to recognise blockquotes. (It also rates the article as GA-worthy.
- The Bot doesn't know about blockquotes. I suppose I could teach it. Another quirk is that the Bot thought the article was biographical, because it was categorised as being about King Louis VIII. (Also, but not in error, it reported that Beaucaire is a disambig, and that Choffel, Jones and Petit-Dutaillis are not used.) Gog is quite right about it being nice and fascinating, and I would encourage you to take it to GAN. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you both. I will consider GAN, but I was intending to add more from Choffel, Jones and Petit-Dutaillis. Srnec (talk) 23:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)