Talk:Siege of Fort St. Jean/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dana boomer in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hello again! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 02:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- Siege begins section, 2nd paragraph, 2nd sentence (He ordered Brown...) is a run-on sentence that needs to be split. Fixed
- As both the Aftermath and Legacy sections are quite short, what would you think of combining them into an "Aftermath and legacy" section? Done
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Ref 35 (Wood) needs to be linked to be consistent with the rest of the refs. Fixed
- In the References section, the Zuehlke ref needs to have authors listed last name first, to be consistent. Fixed
- In the References section, the last ref (Ft. St. Jean website) needs a publisher. Fixed
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- There are a few prose and reference issues that need to be addressed, so I am placing this review on hold for now. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Dana boomer (talk) 03:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- I think I've addressed your concerns. (I also realized I hadn't actually added the Lanctot reference, even though there were citations pointing to it. Bad MP...) Let me know if anything else crops up. Magic♪piano 14:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, so I'm passing this article to GA status. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response! Dana boomer (talk) 15:44, 23 February 2009 (UTC)