Talk:Siege of Klis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 12:37, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Well-written:

After making some grammatical corrections and minor word tweaks, the prose of the content seems in good order, and the content follows MOS guidelines. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

Verifiable with no original research:

There is no original research in the article; it has good, reputable third-party sources cited, and makes frequent use of inline citations. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:53, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)

(c) it contains no original research

Broad in its coverage:

The article seems to cover all important aspects of the topic for which reliable information is available, and does not contain anything trivial. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

The article's content does not have any neutrality issues. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

No edits in the most recent editing history for the article appear to be any form of edit-warring. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 11:12, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

Both the images in this article serve a relevant purpose, and have appropriate captioning. Both are from the Wikimedia Commons and have valid licenses. Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 10:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

After checking the article thoroughly and making some minor improvements, I feel it is well-ready for GA status. Congratulations! Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 16:58, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, this was fast! :) Again, thanks for help with grammar. Regards, Kebeta (talk) 17:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome! :) Like my singing? Ha-la-la-la-la-la-LA-LAAA!!! (talk) 17:27, 15 December 2012 (UTC)