Talk:Siege of Porto Ferrajo

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Thurgate in topic GA Review
Good articleSiege of Porto Ferrajo has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 9, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Siege of Porto Ferrajo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 19:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    prose:   (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
     
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit

1. by 1801. Suggest - By 1801

2. Kelly refusing to burn. Suggest - Kelly refused to burn


I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 19:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, all done--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:11, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Passed. Good job Jacky. Thurgate (talk) 21:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)Reply