Talk:Siegfried Huneck/GA1
Latest comment: 2 years ago by AryKun in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 07:19, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
- Okay, pretty solid article overall, but I have a few comments. Suggestions for rewording are optional, while those based on MOS should generally be implemented.
- The lead shouldn't have any citations, especially since all the info seem to already be cited in the body.
- Removed citation. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- 9 September 1928 – 9 October 2011 → 9 September, 1928 – 9 October, 2011 per MOS:DATECOMMA
- Not quite; as explained in the link, that comma style only applies to month–day–year format. The applicable policy here is MOS:BIRTHDATE. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- All the German words and phrases in the article need lang templates.
- Added lang templates to phrases and titles. I don't think it's needed for individual words that use the same characters as English. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- "primary school here" → "primary school there"
- Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- "delay because of" → "delay caused by"
- Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- "study chemistry University of Jena" → "study chemistry at the University of Jena"
- Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- "time, so no" → "time and so no"
- Done. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- "on the chemistry of amino-derivatives of pentacyclic triterpenes" → "on the chemistry of amino-derivatives of pentacyclic triterpenes"
- Triterpene was linked previously, but linked the other. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Liverwort is duplinked.
- Fixed. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- "retirement, in 1995 Huneck" → "retirement, in 1995, Huneck"
- Comma moved. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Are the binominal authorities for the species named after him necessary? They don't seem particularly relevant.
- Perhaps not to everyone, but they instantly answer the question "who named species after this person?" without having to click further. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Perhaps add a photo of one of the species named after him, as otherwise the article entirely lacks images.
- Couldn't find any free images of these species for use (Opegrapha huneckii doesn't really count as it's a junior synonym). However, I did add a fair-use image of him. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- On what basis were the publications mentioned chosen?
- My criteria were sort of a combination of "not too short", "representative of his life work", "has been discussed/mentioned as an important work of his in his obituary", but I'm open to suggestions for adding/removing. Esculenta (talk) 16:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Refs are consistently formatted and reliable.
- A couple searches of random phrases from teh article turned up nothing except for Wikipedia and mirrors, so copyvio seems good. AryKun (talk) 10:35, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
- Okay, passes the criteria now. AryKun (talk) 06:01, 13 May 2022 (UTC)