Talk:Siena Cathedral
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 28 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Csteph13. Peer reviewers: Kcade1.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 09:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Needs more citations
editGreetings that are parts of this article that need more references. Regards, — JoeHebda • (talk) 13:38, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
Untitled
editOne of your articles states that the mosaic floor/pavement is on view in its entirety (uncovered) for a few weeks every year;what are the dates for 2008,please?Katy Bedford 13:38, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Piccolomini Library
editThere is a fee to enter the library. It is worth every Euro.
Article Evaluation
editEvaluating Content: The content of this article is pretty in-depth. It goes over dates of construction and styles of architecture. Some of the numerical statistics and dates conflict with others presented in the article. It mentions different influences, from people to time periods, that impacted the creation and renovations of this building. This article touches on specific aspects of the building, from structural features to decorative and sculptural embellishments. Evaluation Tone: The tone of this article is pretty neutral. It doesnt have any bias for anything, keeping the structural elements of this building in the spotlight at all times. Evaluating Sources: There are only a few sources cited. With the length of the article and all of the information presented, there should be more citing within the article itself. When looking at the sources cited on the bottom of the page, there are several that come from the same source, The Art Bulletin. A couple of the articles look like unreliable sources. They have good information but are very biased and are the types of articles that say "Where to visit when in Italy". Checking the Talk Page: There isn't much discussion on the talk page, with only three comments. One talks about sources, another about adding information to specific data presented, and another saying its worth spending money to go to it. There is however, interest from four other wiki projects. Bryanlane4 (talk) 17:35, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Piccolomini frescoes
editI take issue with this sentence:
The visual impact of these very colorful frescoes is stunning.
This may well be true, but it is still a subjective assessment and has no place in an NPOV encyclopaedia. I'm removing the sentence Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 11:07, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)