Talk:Sigma Gamma Rho/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Sigma Gamma Rho. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Untitld
I think you should have a section on Prominent women Sigma Gamma Rho Sorority Inc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.49.7.125 (talk • contribs)
- The information was recently deleted, and I have restored the information. Real96 08:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Affiliate Members
Where is the information on the affiliate organizations of Sigma Gamma Rho? The Rhomeos are listed, however there are two nationally recognized affiliate organizations (Philos and Rhoer Club) which are not listed.
It is important these organizations are listed as they are a important part of this sorority.
Having knowledge of how to use this tool (Wikipedia)is one thing. But what's more important is the quality of the information being placed on this site. This is not for just Sigma Gamma Rho, but for all Fraternities and Sororities listed on this site.
19:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Genni19 19:59, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Check the organization's official website. Real96 01:03, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
I have nominated this article to be deleted. It's a blatant advertisement for the organization, and even after tags places over a year ago, references and sources have not been properly cited. This article needs a major fix to be encyclopedic or just not exist at all. Discuss.Stuckon1111 (talk) 03:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
- Meh, you PRODed the article. If you want the article to be improved, you can look for references. Wikipedia has many articles which aren't referenced properly and aren't deleted. Miranda 04:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Hazing
So Sigma Gamma Rho "does" promote hazing? Drakon09 (talk) 22:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Sigma Gamma Rho. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140203064940/http://www.abccolumbia.com/our-station/our-team/236036961.html to http://www.abccolumbia.com/our-station/our-team/236036961.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140228170327/http://hydeia2.blogspot.com/p/biography.html to http://hydeia2.blogspot.com/p/biography.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140203041326/http://romanceincolor.com/authormthmonkou.htm to http://romanceincolor.com/authormthmonkou.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151204184232/http://www.blackgirlwrite.com/ to http://www.blackgirlwrite.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:41, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
"THE COAT OF ARMS IN THIS ARTICLE IS WRONG! "
If this is true wouldn't it be better to just swap in the correct coat of arms?