Talk:Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw
Latest comment: 5 months ago by 118.210.215.241 in topic Typo
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sikorsky H-19 Chickasaw article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MI-4?
editWhy all the crap (including a picture) of some Soviet copycat? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.61.139 (talk) 20:28, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- While the Mi-4 was by no means a copycat of the S-55/H-19 (In fact it was more comparible in capability to the S-58), I agree that discussion of the Mi-4 doesn't really belong here.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:45, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Why article named "H-19" rather than "S-55"?
editHi, out of curiosity, wouldn't the article name be more generic if the Sikorsky designation S-55 is used, instead of the USAF one (i.e.: H-19). Just a suggestion. Regards, DPdH (talk) 17:19, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
Typo
editChile not Chili 118.210.215.241 (talk) 21:18, 30 May 2024 (UTC)