| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sikorsky S-60 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Sikorsky S-60 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
N-reg
editBillCJ,
What was the N-reg for the sole S-60? Based on previous Sikorsky practice, I assume the construction number was 60-001. I am attempting to fill in the <www.helis.com/databse> entry on the S-60.
R/ vertol-107Vertol-107 (talk) 18:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know. Some of the guys on WT:AIR are good with registry searches, so we might ask there. I'm not sure I'll ever finish this one, especially snce I've been unable to find any specs for it. If you want to help out on this one when you are done there, any help would be appreciated. Even though only one was built, it was an important step on the way to the S-64/CH-54, and I'd like to see it with its own page here someday. - BillCJ (talk) 04:47, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Vietnam Cat
editVietnam War category for a single prototype helicopter? MilborneOne (talk) 21:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- Just a leftover from the Sikorsky CH-37 Mojave page I used to start the article. BushRanger has taken care of it. - BilCat (talk) 21:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC)