Talk:Silent Storm engine

Latest comment: 4 years ago by FOARP in topic Requested move 19 September 2020
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Silent Storm engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Silent Storm engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Silent Storm engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 September 2020

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Plasma (Engine), IW Engine - consensus to move, all others no consensus
There have been five !votes including the nomination, of which three are supports and two are opposes (one against all but Plasma (Engine), and the other against only Silent Storm and Quake). A simple counting of !votes would deliver this result, but assessing the arguments made also leads in this direction. Particularly ferret's point on natural disambiguation is important and SnowFire appears to have had a look to see what the state of play is in terms of natural disambiguation in the referencing (which also ultimately indicates a potential WP:COMMONNAME if this is how people are naturally referring to it). I am satisfied that IW Engine is not a natural disambiguation if this is the result of that analysis.
Against this we have perceived consistency, an argument that is not without merit, but per policy parenthetical disambiguation should only be used where other methods of disambiguation supported by policy fail to deliver an optimal title (i.e., Natural disambiguation should be preferred). In ictu oculi is right that something already parenthetically DAB'd should at least be consistent with other parenthetical DABs hence Plasma (Engine) should move.
I did consider another relisting, but this discussion has seen no movement since early last month and none more is likely. A "no consensus" close does not foreclose further discussion on movement if the nom or anyone else wants to have another crack at these.(non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 22:05, 5 November 2020 (UTC)Reply



– The most common disambiguation in Category:Video game engines is "(game engine)", so this change would make the titles above WP:CONSISTENT with the rest. Maggie (library), Moai (software) and Phaser (game framework) might also belong here as they are in this category but I wasn't sure. Gonnym (talk) 07:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Relisting. Jerm (talk) 15:56, 4 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have no opinion overall, but Euphoria should not be moved. It is not a game engine, you can't make games with it. I've fixed the article to remove the misleading game engine references suggesting as such. Pathogen-David (talk) 08:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply