Talk:Silesian language
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Silesian language article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Possible source
editThis source may be useful in supporting this article: Sojka, Eugenia (2021). "Decolonizing Upper Silesia: Reclaiming and Validating a Hybrid Culture in Scholarly and Literary Discourses". Cultural Change in East-Central European and Eurasian Spaces. Springer Nature. Ibadibam (talk) 17:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Phonology
editThere is no section of this article on phonology which is very important in terms of language 2A00:23C7:588B:CA01:5177:ECE8:8B83:1098 (talk) 00:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Not Czechoslovak variety
editThe source cited for putting Silesian within the Czech-Slovak group was Glottolog, which is a tertiary source like Wikipedia.
The sources cited by Glottolog itself do not seem to support the claim that it belongs to the Czech-Slovak bloc of West Slavic, but rather class it as a Lechitic variety, either as its own language (at the same rank as Polish and Kashubian) or subsumed within Polish.
I have removed the statement in the leading section of the article about Silesian being a Czech-Slovak variety, as it does not seem to be supported by valid sources. saɪm duʃan Talk|Contribs 09:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Saimdusan I will note that probably the thing referenced is a lect in the Czech republic also sometimes called Silesian - however the vast majority of the time people are referring to the variety spoken in Poland, which has very clear phonetic reflexes from this specific branch, in particular most people claim it comes from Old Polish or even Middle Polish (though more often Old Polish), and this is how it is handled on Wiktionary. Vininn126 (talk) 14:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
Request move to Silesian dialect
editSilesian is a dialect of Polish, not a language. Aside from loanwords from German, it is practically a relic of Old Polish. FeldmarschallGneisenau (talk) 03:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)