Talk:Silex website builder
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lexoyo in topic plz undo the last 2 changes by Libbyasoke
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
rewrite this page
editthis page is obsolete, we should rewrite it and even rename it
also consider changing these pages
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Website_builder
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silex
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silex_Flash_CMS
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SourceForge
and make a page to explain that http://www.silex.me is a silex hosted service by Silex Labs foundation, free and libre
Lexoyo (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- It needs to be rewritten from secondary and independent sources. I have reverted the rewrite as being poorly-sourced, promotional, and a violation of WP:COI. --Ronz (talk) 19:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
How is this notable?
editTo start the rewrite, how does this meet our notability criteria? --Ronz (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Ronz
- Not sure about the notability.. But the info about Silex here is wrong and outdated. So maybe we should just delete this page then? 212.194.253.203 (talk) 00:04, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- If you don't think we'll be able to find any sources to show it is notable, the we could delete the article or trim it, knowing that it will remain at risk of being deleted. --Ronz (talk) 00:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- I guess we could find sources to show it is notable (we are around for more than 10 years now, little community, a bunch of articles, project of the month on sourceforge...) but given the time it took me to fix the old info, I am not sure I can afford giving another shot... I'll think about it but feel free to "trim it" or delete it, I kept the text I wrote. Thank you for answering anyway. And for your contributions to wikipedia (I'm a fan seriously). Best, Alex. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.194.253.203 (talk) 00:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- I've searched a bit for potential sources, but haven't found anything useful...
- How about just removing outdated information in the meantime? --Ronz (talk) 00:56, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- I guess we could find sources to show it is notable (we are around for more than 10 years now, little community, a bunch of articles, project of the month on sourceforge...) but given the time it took me to fix the old info, I am not sure I can afford giving another shot... I'll think about it but feel free to "trim it" or delete it, I kept the text I wrote. Thank you for answering anyway. And for your contributions to wikipedia (I'm a fan seriously). Best, Alex. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.194.253.203 (talk) 00:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
- If you don't think we'll be able to find any sources to show it is notable, the we could delete the article or trim it, knowing that it will remain at risk of being deleted. --Ronz (talk) 00:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
plz undo the last 2 changes by Libbyasoke
editit seems like promotion to me: this person removed a valid link and added a link to a website which is related ro website builders but not to Silex Lexoyo (talk) 11:14, 20 April 2021 (UTC)