Talk:Silver (video game)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by GUtt01 in topic Urgent Attention Needed

Untitled

edit

At present, this article seems to be little more than someones personal opinion about the game. Rewrite it to meet a higher standard or delete it. -- Grahn 13:14, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure where you got the idea that this is POV, while it's very short, it seems fairly well-written and neutral. The game didn't sell all that many copies (at least in Europe) and most of the coverage it got was in a number of compilations, although this needs a source. The rest looks fine though. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs   08:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Yes, now it is well-written and factual (thanks to Hectigo). Take a look in the history at how it looked up until 2 April 2006 and I am sure you will understand where I got the idea. -- Grahn 01:55, 23 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

A link to http://www.spiralhouse.co.uk/ the company that made the game was removed as an inappropriate link...what? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.150.146.193 (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:SilverBox.jpg

edit
 

Image:SilverBox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Help updating

edit

At the moment,this article dosent seem up to standard. Could someone with the game add in the following a list of Charcters and a more detailed plot. Could some onealso please go through my changes and correct them if wrong. 23 September 2009

Blah - I still have the game around somewhere & I most probably can get it working on an old machine that I got lying around. but I think the whole article generally needs more detail - for instance. it was TINY Computers LTD that distributed the game with their machines first as I haven't heard anyone who bought a TIME system mention that they received the game. & to my knowledge - TINY computers went into administration & was bought out by their Rival TIME computers, So this whole article needs to be re-written. I will do it if I have time. 92.29.58.16 (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Urgent Attention Needed

edit
 
 

Urgent Attention is Needed with this article, to bring it in line with Wikipedia's standards for articles, including the guidelines for articles on video games. The issues with this article are as follows:

  • There is no information regarding the gameplay of this video game. Such detail is required.
  • The information currently listed within the article appears to be tailor made to appease fans of the game, and is thus not truly suitable for the article.
  • The information laid out in this article is not done to an encyclopedic style suitable for Wikipedia.

One area that could also be done, would be information regarding the development of the game. If these areas could be improved, amended, and edited well, this should help to improve the article in general. GUtt01 (talk) 14:46, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Source

edit