Talk:Silver Star Mountain (Skamania County, Washington)/GA1
Latest comment: 5 years ago by DannyS712 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi. I'm going to be doing this review. Looking forward to it.
Reviewer: DannyS712 (talk · contribs) 00:09, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Review
editGood Article review progress box
|
Notes
edit- Done “the southwestern corner of the Gifford Pinchot National Forest” stated in the lede and in the first paragraph of the geography section - suggest removal from the lede
- Not sure I follow. Why would it have to be removed from the lead? ceranthor
- I don't think it needs to be repeated, and I think its a minor enough detail that it need not be in the lede --DannyS712 (talk) 01:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn Geography section - do we really need to state which source gives each of the 3 values? What about - "sources disagree about its elevation, with values ranging from 4364 to 4382 feet" or - "its elevation is approximately 4370 ft"?
- I've tried that in the past for other volcano/mountain articles, but I think the three values approach is a better method. ceranthor 15:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done “ As a result, runoff has eroded gullies on local slopes and removal of soil.” - what does this mean? - "runoff has increased removal of soil"? - missing a verb I think
- Yes. I'll add the "increased" before "removal". ceranthor 15:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done ecology - "unusually low elevations" - specific source?
- Done Geology section - too technical for me to fully understand, tried reading it out load and trying to make sense of what it means, couldn't really
|
- Done "Trail #180E" in human history section - too specific if there is no map included
- This is the name of the trail, with "Indian Pits."
- Yes but I don't think its needed
- I don't follow. If I just said 180, then I would be using a less specific term. That seems silly to me if a more specific name is available. ceranthor 16:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Then can you make it clear that this is the name of the trail? I didn't understand that at first --DannyS712 (talk) 20:38, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Please make it clear that 180E = Indian Pits --DannyS712 (talk) 19:26, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Request withdrawn "Indian Pits" should be in quotes
- Could you clarify why? I don't see why it should be in quotes, though if it's a grammatical error I'm happy to change it. ceranthor 13:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- IMO (as a native english speaker) "Indian Pits" is the name of the trail. Thus, the trail is referred to as the Indian Pits because you are quoting the name...
- Sorry, I still don't understand what you mean. I don't see why the name of the trail should be put in quotes. ceranthor 16:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Done "The September 1902..." entire paragraph - lots of trivia details IMO - do we need to know that, inter alia, there was once a radio receiver there
- A fair point. I think the radio receiver is definitely trivia, though I think the rest about fires is interesting local history, and it serves as preface to the fire lookout on Silver Star. ceranthor 13:26, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- It may be interesting, but can we shorten it a bit?
- It's only a paragraph - what do you specifically suggest cutting out to make it shorter? ceranthor 16:52, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
- Then nevermind
- Done Similar issue with the recreation section - I don't think we need to know that there are no restrooms at the trailhead, etc
|
Discussion
edit- Please note here when you have fixed the issues noted above, and once I confirm that I will strike them. Please do not just remove them yourself. --DannyS712 (talk) 03:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Started responding to some of these. Will aim to get to all of them by EOD. ceranthor 15:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
- Didn't get to the rest today. Will finish tomorrow! ceranthor 03:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Should all be addressed or replied to now. ceranthor 13:46, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Think I've addressed the lithologic unit, recreation, and trail name concerns. ceranthor 14:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ceranthor: See updated notes above --DannyS712 (talk) 19:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Anything else above that I might have missed? Thanks for your timely replies throughout this process so far. ceranthor 00:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ceranthor: See the notes above that are not marked as done, including "the SW corner..." (first note), trail 180E, etc --DannyS712 (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Got the SW corner and 180E notes I think. I still don't think it makes sense to put quotations around the Indian Pits name; it's just the name of the trail, not a quotation. ceranthor 01:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ceranthor: okay. But,
A number of ditches near the mountain known as the Indian Pits can be seen on one of the trails known as the Indian Pits Trail #180E and also occur in other parts of the Columbia River Gorge area.
this is even more confusing that it was previously. Are the indian pits the ditches, the mountain, or the trails? Can you rephrase this? --DannyS712 (talk) 03:06, 7 January 2019 (UTC)- @DannyS712: Think I fixed this. ceranthor 13:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ceranthor: okay. But,
- @DannyS712: Got the SW corner and 180E notes I think. I still don't think it makes sense to put quotations around the Indian Pits name; it's just the name of the trail, not a quotation. ceranthor 01:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ceranthor: See the notes above that are not marked as done, including "the SW corner..." (first note), trail 180E, etc --DannyS712 (talk) 00:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Anything else above that I might have missed? Thanks for your timely replies throughout this process so far. ceranthor 00:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ceranthor: See updated notes above --DannyS712 (talk) 19:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- @DannyS712: Think I've addressed the lithologic unit, recreation, and trail name concerns. ceranthor 14:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.