Talk:Silvergate Bank

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Brian Fenton in topic New revelations about Silvergate

This article is a mess

edit

I don't have the time to fix this right now, but it's got at least 30 to 40 errors because it's written in British English. The subject of the article is an American bank and it should be in American English. Coolcaesar (talk) 04:21, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

This may hugely surprise you, but British English is an acceptable form of English, not some kind of aberration. Therefore, there are no "errors" in the article. 2A02:1810:B414:7900:F9BB:818:4C18:C253 (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
See MOS:TIES. When an article is strongly linked to a specific dialect of English by its very subject nature, we use that dialect. --Coolcaesar (talk) 10:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

False statements

edit

Inacurate information (for example: Sulvergate corporation is still existing even if they ate voluntarily liquidating the bank budiness and still evauating what to do mext 2A01:CB16:77:FB10:A443:2A8D:7613:993A (talk) 05:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

New revelations about Silvergate

edit

Would be good if a more experienced editor incorporated some of the info from this article by Nic Carter about the end of Silvergate from the POV of the bank themselves. Brian Fenton (talk) 15:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply