Talk:Simon Boyleau

Composer project assessment

I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project B-class review. You can find my review on the comment page. If you have questions or comments, feel free to repond there, here, or on my talk page. Article is still B class. Magic♪piano 15:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Simon Boyleau/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

==Composers Project Assessment of Simon Boyleau: 2008-11-14== This is an assessment of article Simon Boyleau by a member of the Composers project, according to its assessment criteria. This review was done by Magicpiano. If an article is well-cited, the reviewer is assuming that the article reflects reasonably current scholarship, and deficiencies in the historical record that are documented in a particular area will be appropriately scored. If insufficient inline citations are present, the reviewer will assume that deficiencies in that area may be cured, and that area may be scored down. Adherence to overall Wikipedia standards (WP:MOS, WP:WIAGA, WP:WIAFA) are the reviewer's opinion, and are not a substitute for the Wikipedia's processes for awarding Good Article or Featured Article status. ===Origins/family background/studies=== Does the article reflect what is known about the composer's background and childhood? If s/he received musical training as a child, who from, is the experience and nature of the early teachers' influences described? Good, given limited source material ===Early career=== Does the article indicate when s/he started composing, discuss early style, success/failure? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed? Good, given limited source material ===Mature career=== Does the article discuss his/her adult life and composition history? Are other pedagogic and personal influences from this time on his/her music discussed? Good, given limited source material ===List(s) of works=== Are lists of the composer's works in WP, linked from this article? If there are special catalogs (e.g. Köchel for Mozart, Hoboken for Haydn), are they used? If the composer has written more than 20-30 works, any exhaustive listing should be placed in a separate article. No listing of known works. ===Critical appreciation=== Does the article discuss his/her style, reception by critics and the public (both during his/her life, and over time)? Musical style is described; criticism and appreciation (modern or historical, if available) is not. ===Illustrations and sound clips=== Does the article contain images of its subject, birthplace, gravesite or other memorials, important residences, manuscript pages, museums, etc? Does it contain samples of the composer's work (as composer and/or performer, if appropriate)? (Note that since many 20th-century works are copyrighted, it may not be possible to acquire more than brief fair use samples of those works, but efforts should be made to do so.) If an article is of high enough quality, do its images and media comply with image use policy and non-free content policy? (Adherence to these is needed for Good Article or Featured Article consideration, and is apparently a common reason for nominations being quick-failed.) No image of subject, but none may be available. No audio samples or discography. ===References, sources and bibliography=== Does the article contain a suitable number of references? Does it contain sufficient inline citations? (For an article to pass Good Article nomination, every paragraph possibly excepting those in the lead, and every direct quotation, should have at least one footnote.) If appropriate, does it include Further Reading or Bibliography beyond the cited references? Article is well-referenced and footnoted. ===Structure and compliance with WP:MOS=== Does the article comply with Wikipedia style and layout guidelines, especially WP:MOS, WP:LEAD, WP:LAYOUT, and possibly WP:SIZE? (Article length is not generally significant, although Featured Articles Candidates may be questioned for excessive length.) Lead is not strictly per WP:LEAD, but article is also not very long. ===Things that may be necessary to pass a Good Article review=== Lead might require work. Picky GA reviewers may question sufficiency of footnotes. Lack of subject image may be questioned (be prepared to defend it). ===Summary=== The only significant lacks content-wise appear to be a works list, and evidence (or stated lack) of critical appreciation. Obviously an image of the subject would be nice. Otherwise nice. Still B class. -- Magic♪piano 15:31, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 21:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 06:13, 30 April 2016 (UTC)