| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Notability
editI don't understand the problem about his notability: in particular, I don't understand the reasoning "just because he created some notable software does not mean he's notable". How would this sound: "just because he wrote some notable books does not mean he's notable"? Ludicrous, of course. Here's what Wikipedia:BIO#Creative_professionals says:
- The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, which has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.
Now, this cannot be applied to software developers verbatim, because software is not reviewed like films or books are, but I think the general idea is quite clear ("significant or well-known work"). GregorB (talk) 23:44, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Note that NASM at least is the subject of an independent book (Assembly Language Step-by-Step 2nd edition by Jeff Duntemann) as well as numerous articles in a variety of magazines and reliable websites. puTTY is even better known and more widely covered. JulesH (talk) 21:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
There's a topic for PuTTY. In this topic, most of the information is provided by one primary source. The topic for NASM mentions his involvement, but does not appear to provide a source for original-author, etc. (and the NASM website -- a primary source -- disagrees with that, stating that it was written by Tatham and Hall) TEDickey (talk) 00:38, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
I don't think the puzzle games run on the nintendo ds
editI haven't seen a DS port of the puzzle games.