This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
As it currently stands, it does not read like an advertisement to me. Have recent edits improved it adequately that this tag can now be removed? If not, is there something in particular you are unhappy about as it reads fine to me at the moment.138.38.93.48 (talk) 138.38.93.48 (talk) 22:54, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The sentence about the person's art work was linked to references that were either out of date or were sales sites. I believe these are inappropriate by wikipedia standards, and removed those. Having done that, I think that the rest of the article has no inappropriate links, so that comment should be removed at this point. Scientist999 (talk) 19:57, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}
