Talk:Sinthgunt/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 20:01, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another very nice article! I can find no problems with it, so I am passing the article to GA status. If you have any questions, drop me a note here or on my talk page. Dana boomer (talk) 20:06, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I enjoyed writing it, and I am glad you enjoyed reading it. :} :bloodofox: (talk) 03:49, 8 October 2008 (UTC)