Talk:Sir John Gladstone, 1st Baronet

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Slave trader?

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The introduction says he was a slave-trader, but there is nothing in the article about this. If its true then something should be added in the article. If its not then it should be substituted for 'slave-owner'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LastDodo (talk • contribs) 16:17, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

I agree, and have made the change. DuncanHill (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Somebody deleted the entry which quantified the number of slaves owned by Gladstone at the time of emancipation. This entry is properly referenced. When you click on the citation, you can then go to each individual property, and click on "details". You will then see how many enslaved people were on each estate. A simple addition can then produce the figures of total compensation and total enslaved people. Please don't delete this again before discussing it here.Mikesiva (talk) 08:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

How much was £106,769 worth in today's money? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

'Free labour'

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

"Gladstone expressed a desire to obtain free labour from India"

This sentence might be confusing because 'free labour' implies no-cost labour.

What the word 'free' means here is 'non-slave' i.e. indentured workers.

The letter to which it is referenced is quite clear.

So I've changed it to 'indentured labourers'. 2.97.225.243 (talk) 15:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic