Talk:Sir Leo Hielscher Bridges

Merger

This page covers the same topic as Gateway Bridge. Someone should amalgamate them. As the Gateway Bridge is the only one of its name, I think that the content on this page should be moved in with the content on the Gateway Bridge page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathieumcguire (talk • contribs) 09:04, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

They should be merged, so I've slapped merge templates on the both of them. The article should probably live at Gateway Bridge, Brisbane for two reasons: we're not entirely certain that the Gateway Bridge is the only so-named one in the world; and reasons of consistency with the other bridges, which all follow the "X Bridge, Brisbane" format. Slac speak up! 20:16, 10 May 2005 (UTC)

I merged the briges here on the principles were started above, that this has the most inbound links and it is better the articles are merged sooner rather than later. MeltBanana 14:33, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Wikicode problem

I'm want to insert the following reference for the length:

• [http://www.mainroads.qld.gov.au/mrweb/Prod/Content.nsf/DOCINDEX/Gateway+Upgrade+Project+-+Gateway+History!OpenDocument

Gateway Upgrade Project - Gateway Project - Main Roads]

It's coming out looking like crap. What's the problem?

--Tphcm 06:23, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Timeline of openings

Does anyone know the new timeline? It says mid 2009 for the deviation to open, but the road isn't even layed yet. I am guessing this has been delayed considerably.--58.111.133.169 (talk) 09:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sir Leo Hielscher Bridges. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100218141516/http://www.news.com.au:80/couriermail/story/0,23739,26722182-3102,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26722182-3102,00.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100218141516/http://www.news.com.au:80/couriermail/story/0,23739,26722182-3102,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,26722182-3102,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Toll timeline confusion

Slight editing issue found - it says there are tolls twice and does not specify which bridges are tolled. Was the bridge tolled twice or did someone specify the toll in the wrong spot? P.S. also mention the toll deadline pushback caused by the consolidation then privatisation of the toll road Jordf32123 (talk) 03:33, 27 December 2022 (UTC)