Talk:Sir Robert Woodard Academy

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Charlesdrakew in topic Merger proposal
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sir Robert Woodard Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:40, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

I propose that Boundstone Community College be merged with Sir Robert Woodard Academy. I say this, as right now, this article feels more like an advertisement than an informative article, and the Boundstone article seems to have a lot more history and informative content. Though I believe this would be beneficial, I can understand if people oppose the merger due to wanting to distance the Academy from Boundstone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Straypotato (talkcontribs) 09:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

These seem to be separate entities and should be kept as two articles.Charles (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)Reply