Talk:Sistan and Baluchestan insurgency
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Amir Ghandi in topic Saravan
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sistan and Baluchestan insurgency article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1978 Iranian politics, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alleged supporters
editIt is fine to discuss support allegations within the article, but putting alleged parties in the infobox is against Wikipedia policies - see WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:VERIFY.GreyShark (dibra) 05:47, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Greyshark09: I think we had the discussion somewhere else before and you just skipped it. It is very intresting that you let Qatar be in the infobox and still believe that the other countries are WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:VERIFY. Why? For the same reason that you remove Israel and let Iran be in the infobox? Pahlevun (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- Are you kidding me - removing Iran? maybe also removing Jundallah? Those are the belligerents...
- Now let's be serious - i removed all "alleged" parties, because we do not put "alleged" in infoboxes. End of story. Qatar might be removed as well, unless we have some solid sources on its involvement and some official statement by Qataris would help.GreyShark (dibra) 16:40, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- End of story? Looks like you did hesitate to click on the links. Click and you will get my point. Pahlevun (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- I've just inspected the only source which hadn't said "alleged" and even that Mashregh News appears to be a really low quality web tabloid. Which sources do you consider reliable enough to support claims on all the stated parties - Sweden, Israel, US, Saudi Arabia etc.?GreyShark (dibra) 13:42, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
- End of story? Looks like you did hesitate to click on the links. Click and you will get my point. Pahlevun (talk) 17:13, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- @Greyshark09: I think we had the discussion somewhere else before and you just skipped it. It is very intresting that you let Qatar be in the infobox and still believe that the other countries are WP:EXCEPTIONAL and WP:VERIFY. Why? For the same reason that you remove Israel and let Iran be in the infobox? Pahlevun (talk) 13:58, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Saravan
editPlease note that the uprising of the people of Saravan has nothing to do with separatist insurgencies.Amir Ghandi (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2021 (UTC)