Talk:Sit Still, Look Pretty

Latest comment: 8 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress

Edits

edit

@Ss112: May I ask why you reverted my edit and asked me to add the access date, then do the exact same edit with the correct access date when you could've just corrected my error in not updating the access dates? FanofMusic (Talk to Me!) 17:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

@FanofMusic: Because then you wouldn't have gotten the message and would still not think it's important. I don't presume that editors would check the edit history of a page afterwards and then go "somebody updated the accessdate, I guess I should do that from now on." It's important because, especially for recent songs, it shows what date that peak was achieved. It helps verify correct chart positions, as URLs and links can often change and thus, another editor can help trace around what date a peak was achieved if the link becomes dead and fix it. Without it, say, an accessdate that only shows when the chart position was first added to the page, somebody would have to look through months of chart archive data for a chart that only goes by weeks (and some do). Ss112 17:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for your response. That makes perfect sense. When I had updated it, I had just spaced that I should've updated the access date as well. FanofMusic (Talk to Me!) 17:16, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Sit Still, Look Pretty (album) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:17, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply