Talk:Sitara ARM processor

Latest comment: 5 years ago by WmMills in topic Sitara was NOT designed by ARM limited

File:Nest thermostat.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
  The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:
  • File:Nest thermostat.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
  • File:Sitara ARM MPU.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Nest thermostat.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Page cut-and-pasted

edit

Sitara was NOT designed by ARM limited

edit

This line is misleading and should be deleted or changed to say "CPU core from ARM Limited"

It is true that the CPU core in Sitara parts comes from ARM Ltd. However Sitara parts are SOCs with lots of other IP in them and that IP comes mostly from TI. Some bigger IP like PCIe and USB often come from outside IP houses but that varies from by exact part number. To date TI has not used ARM IP for peripherals. In all cases the SOC was designed by TI. On Sitara SOCs, ARM IP constitutes less than 20% of the logic in the chip. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WmMills (talkcontribs) 09:56, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply