Talk:Site reliability engineering
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Site reliability engineering article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Timtrent (talk · contribs) on 15 June 2021. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Why was it proposed for deletion?
editSite Reliability Engineering is a different approach to IT Engineering and was acknowledged by many companies other than Google. I would expect to see a meaningful discussion before there is a resolution. https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/devops/what-is-sre Ronnieroxx (talk) 14:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Site reliability engineering is one of the hottest job titles right now. https://techbeacon.com/enterprise-it/what-it-takes-be-site-reliability-engineer is one such source indicating that 22% of IT organizations have a role titled "SRE" these days. https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/02/are-site-reliability-engineers-the-next-data-scientists/ Lizthegrey (talk) 15:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Google came up with SRE, links are to Google. Just like links about the Toyota Production System would, presumably, link to Toyota. That's not a reason NOT to have a wikipedia page about an industry trend, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.168.59.113 (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
While SRE started at Google, right now there are job openings for SRE [1] [2] (even in Wikimedia [3]), Youtube videos [4] [5], Conferences [6], and other resources (RedHat, Atlassian, Microsoft). A better list is here. I'd argue that the article needs to be expanded considerably. (Full disclosure/disclaimer: I'm currently a Google SRE, commenting for myself, not representing Google). sharhalakis 16:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- I've removed the tag, cleaned up the article, and added further references to non-Google sources. I am a software engineer by trade, but I don't and have never worked for Google (unless you count Google Summer of Code years ago, but I don't). GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
- It's a good start but I agree the article should be expanded considerably. Jtingiris (talk) 19:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
While the article would benefit from additional information on this large topic, I believe that it's time to remove the "multiple issues" slur. I request that anyone who believes these warnings still apply to reconsider and perhaps remove them if they are now satisfied with the article so far. Respectfully, — HowardBGolden (talk) 17:48, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
- Any user without a conflict of interest can remove maintenance notices. If someone reverts your removal, then you're expected to discuss on the talk page. Also, I wouldn't call it a "slur", it is a label about the quality of the page. lizthegrey (talk) 21:53, 16 June 2024 (UTC)