Talk:Skaði/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Bloodofox in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 03:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.  
  5. It is stable.  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    6 images, all WPCommons-hosted public domain images.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    No problems here.
Great, thanks for the copyediting and review! :bloodofox: (talk) 03:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply