Talk:Skaði/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Bloodofox in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: maclean (talk) 03:49, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- It is stable.
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- 6 images, all WPCommons-hosted public domain images.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- No problems here.
- Pass/Fail:
- Great, thanks for the copyediting and review! :bloodofox: (talk) 03:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)