This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
non-caps, would be "Klappan coalbed methane proposal" or the like. If this article is only about the coalbed methan project and the politics around it, there is no reason for it to be titled about only one of the groups combatting it; the group article can still exist, but should cover other issues instead of only this one; the coalbed project on ht Tahltan pages and related pages including Sacred Headwaters shoudl also be migrated out of those into a proper article on the proposal. This article serves currently to further a particular agenda/account (for example, has Royal Dutch Shell contributed to it in the way that the WAtershed Coalition people clearly have?). Wikipedia shoudl not be used as a campaign platform see WP:Soapbox.Skookum1 (talk) 02:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Whether moved/renamed or a new standalone article is written, any article with this kind of content on it should have WP:Energy, WP:Mining and WP:Companies, probably also WP:Engineering.....Skookum1 (talk) 02:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
