Talk:Skeleton Warriors
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Question
editHas someone ever critisized how this happens to be the most stereotypical typecasting of characters possible? Is like everything good is light, everything bad is dark or skeleton and only grimskull brakes the mold... The cities, the objects... Everything... CAMPY????
- Probably. Not everyone considers camp to be a bad thing, though. (Oh, and please sign your posts.) Caswin 15:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Skeleton Warriors Logo.jpg
editImage:Skeleton Warriors Logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 11:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Episode 11 description
editI don't know who wrote it, but the description of episode 11 doesn't make a whole lot of sense. You can probably make a guess at what it's trying to say, but it's still pretty unintelligible. I'd update it myself but I haven't seen the show in a long time. Anyone who knows what happened in the episode should update it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.147.83 (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2012 (UTC)