Talk:Ski tunnel
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Listings of sites
editI think this listing is at the limit WP:NOTDIR, given that the article isn't balanced with info about ski tunnels. Also why are sites listed twice? Once in the table under "Tunnels" and once under "Available ski tunnels"? Cornellier (talk) 15:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Never mind, fixed it. Cornellier (talk) 00:37, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
Proposal to merge with Indoor skiing (was indoor ski slope)
editGiven that there're only three sentences on the article and no references, it makes sense to merge it with indoor skiing. Whether alpine skiing or nordic skiing they're both happening in the same environment. One with a slope, one without. It's true that the alpine is more recreational in nature, but they're close enough to be in one article given the poverty of content. If more content is added the pages can be separated again. Since there'd been no comments on this after a year, I actually started work on this today but couldn't finish with the redirect because User:Sportomanokin was editing. --Cornellier (talk) 15:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Support. Ski tunnel says "Except for the shape of the building they are similar to Indoor ski slopes", but does nothing to show how the buildings differ in shape. The first image at Indoor ski slope is captioned "Fortnum Ski Tunnel". If the difference cannot be explained, there is no justification for separate aricles. Maproom (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Redirected rather than merged, as all the information on this page is already in a section at the target. Klbrain (talk) 17:04, 5 July 2017 (UTC)