Talk:Skin Trade (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Chapman86 (talk · contribs) 06:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Although I'm only now declaring the review, I started looking through and carefully reading/reviewing this article over one hour ago. At first, I wasn't familiar with some of the wording that you used, Metal121, but after using a dictionary, this wasn't an issue. I don't see no reason why this article cannot be passed immediately. The lead is clearly detailed; as is the article throughout. It is also written very well! I've read through the MoS/Film on Wikipedia, and I can see that you've been following this and using it as a guideline yourself. Good Job! I've never immediately passed an article for GA before, but I am doing so this time as I feel it is necessary. The only thing I recommend is that you take this article to the Guild of Copyeditors on Wikipedia. They can give this article a little copyediting if/where needed. If you have any queries, feel free to message. -- Chapman86 07:01, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

GA list

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: