Talk:Skinny House (Boston)
 | A fact from Skinny House (Boston) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 April 2008, and was viewed approximately 17,930 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
InfoBox
editThe large photo looks good where it is, so I wasn't sure whether to add template:Infobox Historic building. If you think it looks better the other way, feel free to remove the template. GregManninLB (talk) 14:43, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Template is cool, thanks. I might tackle some more of the red links in your spite house article. If there is any you were hoping to do yourself, please indicate and I will let you "play through". House of Scandal (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Skinny House (Boston). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20080303030127/http://www.themoneyblogs.com/bostonrealestate/my.blog/skinny-and-spite-houses-profiled.html to http://www.themoneyblogs.com/bostonrealestate/my.blog/skinny-and-spite-houses-profiled.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Infobox image
edit@Jonathunder: Sorry, I didn't see you had just recently replaced the infobox image or I would've posted here before boldly replacing. Guess I was hot on your heels on the Freedom Trail. :) Hope you don't mind. Given there wasn't much room between the house and the graveyard, I went for a panorama to be able to get the house in context (between the two others). Wish the light were better, but I think the results were pretty good (might've gotten lucky with the stitching). Let me know if it's controversial. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 04:17, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Our photos appear to have been taken at almost the same time! I agree, of course, that yours shows more context. Jonathunder (talk) 17:05, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Is the location of the entrance noteworthy?
editFrom the article: "The house spans 10.4 feet (3.16 m) at Hull Street, its widest point. There is no entrance here; the house may only be entered via a small alley"
I see the location of the entrance (on the "left" side of the house as seen from the street, rather than on the street) mentioned here - as well as in many articles about the house. Is this really noteworthy though? The front of the house could accommodate a door (as noted elsewhere, it's over ten feet wide).
I feel like it's a stretch that sensationalizes the house a bit. Thoughts?