Order of their names

edit

Although not alphabetical, the google test shows that they are written Randy and Jason more often. —Wikibarista 20:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Probably because it rolls off the tongue better -- Jason and Randy has a repeated N-sound (JasoN ANd ), which requires a hard stop for clarity. Randy and allows you to use a phonetical 'dian', which is much easier and clearer. Ahanix1989 18:19, 13 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sklar Brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

wwdits

edit

https://twitter.com/SklarBrothers/status/1547006604607778817 47.185.222.203 (talk) 06:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Source needed for claim that Dr. Jessica‘s pregnancy loss cards are “critically acclaimed”

edit

We are concerned that this is a matter of personal opinion that jeopardizes the integrity of the article. Is this article a vanity piece? 2603:8000:E241:3C7A:A113:D058:5E14:DF2C (talk) 09:46, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

This whole article reads like a highlight reel, rather an encyclopedic article. I think it'd be worth a complete overhaul, especially on claims like that. Paul (talk) 00:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply