Talk:Sky Television (1984–1990)

Fair use rationale for Image:Sky corporate ident.jpg

Image:Sky corporate ident.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Infobox

Someone screwed up the infobox. Malpass93 (talk) 16:21, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

other details

The following details come from the episode one Channel 4 Doc "Satellite Wars" - Pioneers and Pirates

• Brian Haynes asked Thames tv to back him and there said no.
• He rented the satellite for £300 an hour
• The Satellite were owned by Phone companies and tried to deny the company the use.

Requested move 21 September 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved, to "Sky Television (1989–1990)". (non-admin closure) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:18, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Have How been a good friend of

Y and learn how your email works 💪 and 2603:8080:1000:7507:34BA:31AF:D9E1:B039 (talk) 05:42, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

---

Sky Television plc → Sky Television (1989) – Current title has "plc" distinguishing it from the other Sky Televisions. As per Naming conventions (companies), legal status suffixes such as "plc", "Inc." and so on are generally discouraged as disambiguators.

This applies particularly here- while people may recognise that "plc" implies it's a company, that's not useful if (as in this case) so are all the other Sky Televisions. Most people wouldn't know- or care- which one happened to be the "plc" without further explanation.

(I've suggested a new name- "1989" intended to make clear that this is the historical entity- but if anyone has a better suggestion and/or one more closely in line with the guidelines, I'd be happy to consider that instead.) Ubcule (talk) 13:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Disagree, the company is different. the company which was created in 1990 was never owned by sky fully, hence why it was called BSKYB... you do know there is more than one SKY. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyseiko (talk • contribs)

@Crazyseiko: - I think you've misunderstood the point being made. I'm well aware that the (pre-BSkyB) company was a different entity- hence this edit and the reason it has its own article.

My point was that the title of this article- nothing more- should be changed to make clearer that it refers to the historical (1989-90) entity. I'd guess that most people wouldn't know from the title alone which one "Sky Television plc" referred to (even if it was the only one with that specific name).

Hope this makes it clearer. Ubcule (talk) 17:55, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

• Move to Sky Television (1989–90) Sky Television (1989–1990), formatting consistent with MOS:DATERANGE. WikiRedactor (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.