 | Slaty-backed forktail has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 5, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from Slaty-backed forktail appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 September 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Slaty-backed forktail/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 11:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
I'll take this one. Freikorp (talk) 11:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- I'm passing this. This is my 59th GAN review and only the second one I've felt deserved to be passed immediately. I'm being picky, but the only things I would change would be wikilinking Slate gray in the lead and un-abbreviating IUCN, as people not familiar with conservation (such as myself) won't have a clue what that stands for. Well done on a fantastically written and comprehensive article. Freikorp (talk) 11:59, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Many thanks, Freikorp! I think we may have just given some watchers whiplash, going from this to GA in 25 hours ;) Vanamonde (talk) 12:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Oh wow, I didn't actually notice how recent the improvements were. That's pretty amazing :). Freikorp (talk) 12:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Many thanks, Freikorp! I think we may have just given some watchers whiplash, going from this to GA in 25 hours ;) Vanamonde (talk) 12:23, 5 September 2017 (UTC)