Talk:Sleepy People
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Khazar2 in topic removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Correcting multiple issues
editSince these haven't been covered on the talk page by the editor who originally identified the issues, here they are for discussion.
Objective issues:
- It needs additional references or sources for verification
- It needs sources or references that appear in third-party publications
Subjective issues:
- Its neutrality is disputed
- It may need copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone or spelling
- It may require general cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards
- It may be too long.
While I'm looking into these, any assistance or constructive contributions are welcome - Dann Chinn (talk) 00:02, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- Cleanup - Have now run a quick edit on the article to remove adjectives and phrases in order to improve piece's NPOV status. While admitting that the piece was informed by personal knowledge, I dispute the lack of NPOV (although more third-party references would help). - Dann Chinn (talk) 00:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)