Talk:Sleepycat Software
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editWow. I appreciate that the sources are a miss, but "Sleepycat Software" has 200,000 ghits and "Sleepycat" has 914,000. As a quick demo of the type of sources: history, used in cisco products the period just before Oracle acquired Sleepcat. John Vandenberg 01:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
You've got to be kidding me. It would be difficult to argue Sleepycat is non-notable. --129.15.131.248 01:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
I'm really new to Wikipedia, but I assert that Sleepycat's Berkeley DB has been enormously influential. —RP88 02:29, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Dead links in references
editthe reference links to archive.org do not work. I don't know the right links, so can't update myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.164.187.254 (talk) 07:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
I appreciate it's been four years since your comment, but... it looks like someone's updated the links - they all work now. Hopefully this'll spare someone else checking! 82.70.49.110 (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2015 (UTC)