Talk:Slimelight
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Old discussion
editI have removed the link to http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/visual_arts/article5174749.ece titled "Article on the "restaurant/club" art installation at Electrowerkz" as it requires paid registration to view.
Longest running nightclub- since when?
- it doesnt say longest running nightclub,it says longest running goth club --Steeev 07:08, 25 Nov 2003 (UTC)
the part about how the club was named is confusing. Why was it named slimelight because it was held in a church? surely the more plausible explanation is because it was a parody of the Limelight club. Personally i've always been told that it was as a parody, but if anyone knows for definite, could they please correct the article.
- the limelight was held inside a converted church --MilkMiruku 21:42, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Licencing hours
editEdited this page to correct the times they serve alcohol as the site states: "Yes we have a bar on each floor which serve alcohol untill 2am, then continue to serve soft drinks, tea & coffee untill 7.15am."
- I presume the website is out of date - I've heard from numerous places that it's been extended. Unfortunately I can't find the link to the news article I read on the matter, but I did find this [1]. Mdwh 22:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
slimes
editi added a note about the club being refered to as slimes. a search shows up many results for this, although there arn't as many results for the other name i've heard quite often, "slime shite" ;) --MilkMiruku 14:07, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- well, "slimeshite" gets 185 ;D --MilkMiruku
- I've removed the "slimeshite" part of the name until someone can verify it. Those google hits seemed to all be either forums or unrelated, so I don't see any reliable sources. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 20:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- But if you do a joint google on "slimeshite" and "slimelight", you get a fair number of hits (119) which seem to come from the goth community ... Relevant? Mebbee. Daen (talk) 23:52, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- I've removed the "slimeshite" part of the name until someone can verify it. Those google hits seemed to all be either forums or unrelated, so I don't see any reliable sources. - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 20:16, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
PoV
editI just removed "and whilst it retains it's name, the original spirit has long since been dillutted by the current crop" from the paragraph about the founders. ƕ (talk) 18:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Plane nose section
editThere was a nose section of a plane down in the "smoking yard" when I visited on Saturday, 10 May 2008. Does anyone have any information as to what type of plane it comes from? Details like that make for a more interesting article (and coincidentally sate my curiosity :-) Daen (talk) 23:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- There is some good background on the venue's website, and on the venue's "other" website -- it's a scrap metal recycling plant in the daytime! About a year ago, as a one-off, you could pay for entry to Slimelight (normally £5 for members, £8 for non-members) with a few kilos of unwanted power cables. Some of the more interesting scrap is kept around for use when the venue's used as a film set. ƕ (talk) 22:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Sources, and Electrowekz
editIt is unfortunate that the article was essentially blanked last November, as a number of news sources can now be found on the internet following the death of the club's founder, Mayuan Mak, in December. I don't blame the editor at all, it was done in good faith, and they can't be expected to have a crystal ball. It's just unfortunate.
Rather than restore any of the page as-is, I would suggest that the article be merged with the Electrowerkz article, as has been suggested in the past. It is I think impossible to separate the two, especially looking at the recent sources that have appeared.
I know it is unlikely any editors will see this, but I thought I would make this note on the talk page here before I look at the article history (to preserve the original text for re-writing and referencing) and the proper procedure for merging. H. Carver (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2021 (UTC)