Talk:Slivovitz/Archive 1

Archive 1

Etymology

Can anyone find any reputable sources for the etymology of the word slivovitz? With the -itz suffix, it seems like it came to English through German, but the sliv root is definitely Slavic. Because of geographic proximity and the lack of any Js, I would guess that the word came to German from either Poland or the Czech Republic (I'm sure it was Austria-Hungary at the time). But all this is original research and can't be put in the article.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 20:38, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

I think, that the whole word is entirely slavic. "Sliva" is slavic for plum and "-ovica" is just a common slavic suffix - "-ovitz" is just a germanization of it. So the etymology part is definitelty wrong.--85.216.232.215 (talk) 12:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Designation of Origin

Can anyone find any official record (on europa.eu) of the claims in the article's Designation of Origin section? For example, in Bryndza, there is this citation:

• European Commission (2007-06-11). "Commission Regulation (EC) No 642/2007 of 11 June 2007 registering a name in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications Bryndza Podhalańska (PDO)". Retrieved 2008-06-10.

I tried searching through europa.eu and I couldn't find anything to support the claims about Srpska šljivovica. I did find some pages that seemed to say that any of the countries from the former Yugoslavia could export bottles of sljivovica into the EU. I didn't find any pages on europa.eu that supported the idea that Serbia had any special brand or that the EU had given any of the former Yugoslavian countries an advantage over the others.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 11:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Currently, I think the whole section should be stripped down to just say that Slobodan Milosavljević claims that Serbia has recieved an EU certificate about some exclusive rights to market a Serbian brand of slivovitz and cite the English B92 article.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 11:33, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Maybe a better idea would be to just delete the whole section. it seems from this article that the Serbian Agriculture Ministry has no idea how geographical indications like Protected designation of origin work in the EU:

• "Who makes real slivovitz?". B92. 2007-10-01. Retrieved 2008-06-18.

The EU has decided that no country can claim exclusive rights to slivovitz, plum brandy or any of the names for the same thing in any language. Every country has to use the geographic origin as an adjective in the name of the product. Somehow the Serbian Agriculture Ministry has interpreted this as meaning that they have some kind of trademark for "Serbian Slivovitz". It's complete nonsense.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 22:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Deleted the following:

==Designation of origin==

Following the claims of several nations to the [[protected designation of origin]], in October 2007 the [[European Union]] went for a compromise solution, leaving "slivovitz" as a [[generic name]], and granting individual nations the right to protect the origin with their own adjective.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.b92.net/info/vesti/index.php?yyyy=2007&mm=10&dd=01&nav_id=265855|title=Problemi oko izvoza šljivovice|date=2007-10-01|publisher=[[B92]]|accessdate=2007-10-11|language=Serbian}}</ref> Thus, "Serbian Slivovitz" (''Srpska šljivovica'') will become Serbia's first certified national brand.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.b92.net/eng/news/economy-article.php?yyyy=2007&mm=09&dd=28&nav_category=98&nav_id=44132|title=Slivovitz becomes Serbia’s first brand| publisher=[[B92]]|date=2007-09-28|accessdate=2007-10-11|0}}</ref>

for the reasons listed above.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 22:31, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

Merger

I've never seen this spelled any way but "sliwowitz". It's pronounced slivovitz, but I've never seen it spelled with "v"s rather than "w"s. ~~

It depends which orthography you're used to. The letter 'v' is pronounced like the English 'v' in Czech and Slovak for example but in Polish and German the English 'v' is written 'w'. So it depends where you buy your bottles!

I am pro merge. Specifically, I would make the 'w' spelling a redirect to the 'v' version. --Mdwyer 21:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

How to drink?

What about Hungarian Zwack kosher 3 years old Slivovitz? How would you drink it? I guess well chilled...

In the Czech Republic it was served to me in ice cold shots folowed by a water chaser. Babba Lou 22:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Serbian

Is there any reason why Serbian language is prefered? Slivovitz is common in many other countries. What is the origin of the word root "sliv"? If it is just Slavic root (it is used in other Slavic languages), there is no reason to prefer one language. Miraceti 16:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

sorry but Slivovica is a Serbian drink, traditional drink of Serbs. Serbs speak a Slavic language, and answer me, why is Whisky not a Canadian drink? just because Canadians say Whisky, the origin of Whisky is Irish.

if slivovitz is so clearly of serbian origin as you think, then why did the eu only grant pdo status for srpska šljivovica? if the origin was clear, the eu would have given pdo status for šljivovica without requiring the country name to be an adjective.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 20:29, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

because it is like vodka, you have russian vodka, polish vodka, etc. the same is with rakija, serbs call "sljivovica" a rakija made out of plums, if it's made out of pears it's called "kruskovaca" and so on. rakija made out of plums is a traditional drink in serbia, because serbia is, if not the largest, producer of plums in europe. sljivovica and the serbian plum is something serbs are famous by. sljivovica was introduced by serb immigrants in the austro-hungary, which germanized the name into sliwowitz. eu-pdo-mambo-jambo status will not change the origin of that drink. even if bulgars, croats, albanians, make and drink the same, french wine is not the same as american one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.191.177.229 (talk) 14:52, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Chris Cappocia got some serious issues with Serbian sljivovica , that is why wikipedia got problems with recognition, because of nationalists like you who are trying to minorize someone else's tradition without knowing anything about it. Serbia is the biggest producer of rakija in the world ,sljivovica is with viljamovka the most respected sort of rakija in Serbia and some of the best rakija in the world are from Serbia . Deal with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.221.172.169 (talk) 05:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

The fact that all the religious and non-religios costumes involve Sljivovica in Serbia talks a lot about her origin. Many pre-Chrisitan costumes involve specifically Sljivovica. I don't see a reason to think that any other country is the origin. It is nonsense. But I guess Austro-German School is winning here too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackynikola (talk • contribs) 01:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Distillation

Are you kidding? Nobody would add starch to the plums! And adding suggar may even be illegal in some countries! At least no serious distiller would add that stuff! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.52.47.156 (talk) 23:18, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Not all distillers add starches or sugars, and some don't even add yeast. Also, any objection to adding an explaination that the pits are not intentionally crushed, but are crushed as a byproduct of crushing the plums when the rollers are set close to handle the smallest plums.

Finally, a question. There are several distillers, Castle Spirits and Imperia, who use either pitted prunes, or pitted fresh plums. It's still slivovitz, but without the characteristic bite. Is this a separate style? (or does it even matter?) Bill R

External Links

I was hoping to find some external links. I am most familiar with the Czech version, especially that produced by Rudolph Jelinek. (http://www.rjelinek.com/)

Babba Lou 22:09, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Countries

Why are the countries in which this drink is produced and most commonly consumed not listed at all in this article? Badagnani (talk) 21:19, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I see that all that information did exist in the article, but was removed several months ago. That was very wrong. Please restore it. Badagnani (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

If you can find some reliable source that shows how much is consumed in specific countries, fine. But it's possible to buy and drink Slivovitz in America. If you are talking about the list of all the words for Slivovitz in other languages, we definitely don't need that in the article. That's what the languages sidebar is for.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 21:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I specified very clearly that the nations in which the beverage is produced should be added. Please do it. Blanking that text was a form of encyclopedic malpractice. Sources are abundant. Badagnani (talk) 21:43, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but every Balkan country claims to be the source of slivovitz. The EU settled the matter by not allowing Slivovitz to be used by itself as a protected name. Each country must use their country name as an adjective if they want any protection. Serbian Slivovitz, Croatian Slivovitz, etc. If there was any solid proof that Slivovitz originated in any of those countries, the EU would have granted them PDO.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 22:07, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

That isn't the question. The entire section describing this beverage's habitat and primary areas of production, and cultures with which it is most closely associated, was completely removed a few months ago. That wasn't the best thing for our readers, as sources are abundant. Badagnani (talk) 22:15, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

So you add a source that says Slivovitz originated in Croatia. How is that helpful? Here are two that say it came from Moravia:

• Wilson, Neil (2005). Prague. Lonely Planet. pp. M1 16. ISBN 1-74059-758-3. OCLC 58434605.
• Warren, Matt; Neal Bedford; Jane Rawson (2004). Czech & Slovak republics. Lonely Planet. pp. M1 65. ISBN 1-74104-046-9. OCLC 55129941 55201157 56466554. {{cite book}}: Check |oclc= value (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

  — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 22:33, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Does it state that it originated under that name in Moravia? If so, please add "Croatia or Moravia," with sources, as we'd do for any similarly contested issue at any WP article. Badagnani (talk) 23:10, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Well well well. After the fall and split of Czechoslovakia it might be hard to tell in which part of that (now known as a) region it originated from and especially to find up-to-date (online or other reliable) sources for that. So no need to "fight" over this but rather to figure it out and then add it to the article with citation(s). Till then it'll be still a liquor from former Czechoslovakia for me (since I grew up overseas).

And by the way: Production and origin are two different issues. --Floridianed (talk) 02:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

You're correct about the split between the Czech Republic and Slovakia; let's look for more info about that. I recommend adding separate sections on origin (including whatever the best sources say about this), as well as production (including prominent brands and producing nations), all with sources. Eventually, we'll have the best documented article on this subject. Badagnani (talk) 02:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

To separate origin and production would be a good and more neutral approach. --Floridianed (talk) 02:30, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I started the sections; just add more stuff to them as needed. Badagnani (talk) 02:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Do whatever you think is right to do. I was here coincidentally and just thought, my little neutral input here could help to prevent a potential edit war and more important, bring the discussion back to the merits. --Floridianed (talk) 03:05, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Getting complete information on nations where it's commercially produced can be difficult because some of the products are probably produced only for in-country consumption, and not marketed in English-language (or non-Cyrillic) publications. Badagnani (talk) 03:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, there you have a challenge ;) --Floridianed (talk) 03:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Nations of production

As listed here, nations of production include (apparently alphabetized rather than listed by importance): "Bosnia, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, and to a lesser extent in Austria, Germany, Italy and elsewhere." Hungary isn't listed. Badagnani (talk) 01:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

that seems to merely be an unattributed republishing of an old wikipedia entry. maybe Slivovitz from April 22, 2005. I don't think it should really be considered a reliable source since the old wikipedia article didn't have any sources.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 05:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

OK, like a meme anyone could've written. Badagnani (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Need proof of commercial production in Austria, Bosnia, and Romania. Badagnani (talk) 05:29, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm holding a litre produced in Bosnia next to me, right now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.229.239.114 (talk) 16:27, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Myth of origin

Is this Polish myth of origin real? Badagnani (talk) 02:51, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

That site doesn't look reliable to me at all. But that's just my personal opinion. --Floridianed (talk) 03:21, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I don't know where I heard of this legend before, but maybe it was at this same site. I can't find any other place that mentions the legend, thought it is compelling. Badagnani (talk) 03:22, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

A few other names

This website mentions several beverages with names in German, French, English, and other languages, that are essentially slivovitzes but which don't bear the slivovitz name. I've been weighing this but think they should be mentioned in the article. Badagnani (talk) 05:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

That's the same site you mentioned before. Forget it as a reliable source and by the way: The "German" mentioned in there is from Switzerland. --Floridianed (talk) 05:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

The Pflümli is Swiss German, right. I'm familiar with the Clear Creek product (eau de vies made out of two different types of plums) and it seems the slivovitz experts consider it to be a slivovitz, albeit under a different name. Badagnani (talk) 05:40, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Tell that someone in Switzerland and you might get hurt ;) --Floridianed (talk) 06:12, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

What? Do they call their language something else? I've heard it called "Swiss German." Badagnani (talk) 06:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

No. What I meant is if you tell them that their "Pflümli" is some kind of or similar to Slivovitz you'll be in trouble over there ;) --Floridianed (talk) 06:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I see. It makes sense. Have you visited Bern/Basel/Zürich? Badagnani (talk) 06:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I was there occasionally (especially Zürich) even so it was a long time ago. --Floridianed (talk) 06:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Are you planning on making an exhaustive list? Or only a list of notable distillers?   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 14:14, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

It's just a start, as a sort of "notebook" showing once and for all the actual places that produce it commercially. I think if it's on the Internet, it must be somewhat notable, as there are a lot of home-brewers and "unofficial" producers who don't send any out of their own home regions or nations. Badagnani (talk) 17:54, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

i think we have two different ideas of notable. i was meaning this one: Wikipedia:Notability. it requires signifigant coverage by independent and reliable sources. so that's more than just a company's own website. A list of all commercial slivovitz distillers in the world could be a rather large list. also there might be a question of whether every type of distillation from plums counts as slivovitz or only if the distiller markets it as slivovitz. i think if you end up listing every company that produces some sort of distillation from plums that it will turn into a very long list that probably should be in its own article so it doesn't overwhelm the rest of the slivovitz article.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 18:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Those are good questions. It's just a start, with more information for our readers being better than less. It's certainly better than last week, when the article didn't even mention in which regions the drink was produced or most closely associated with. Badagnani (talk) 18:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Are you planning to add sources to the list? A whole list of red links isn't so great.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 11:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

I think all the names come from the two lists in the External links. I'm not sure I have enough info to make a separate article for each producer. They can be unwikilinked if necessary, if it looks bad. Badagnani (talk) 12:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

For example, Zwack calls their plum distilled drink Pálinkák[2]. Does that mean it's not Slivovitz? and "Farmers from Łącko region" aren't exactly commercial producers. There is already an article for Stefan Nemanja, but it's for the saint, not the distiller. Flores is about the island in south-east Asia, not the Serbian distiller. And what rules are you using for inclusion? There are several American slivovitz producers: Black Star Farms, Clear Creek Distillery, Peach Street Distillers, Stringer's Orchard…   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 13:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

They're good questions. I would lean toward including all of them as slivovitz producers even if some other local name is used (primarily because all the plum brandies seem to be embraced as such by the Slivovitz Festival people), but I'm not sure how other editors feel about this. Badagnani (talk) 17:48, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Origin

Someone just added that slivovitz may have first been distilled in Serbia or Moravia, but the four sources presented have no visible text. What are the actual quotes? Badagnani (talk) 01:11, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

I added the quotes and page numbers for the citations for Moravia. Only the citations for Serbia are missing them now.   — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 05:01, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Conflicting origin claims

Are there any authoritative, historical sources that could settle the origin of Slivovitz? Or should all the reasonably reliable sources be left in the article as possibilities? This is how the sentence currently stands in the article:

Although the exact origins of slivovitz are unknown, it is believed to have been first produced in the Balkans (possibly in Croatia, Serbia, Moravia, Czechoslovakia, Hungary or Bulgaria).

  — Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 05:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

References

Most likely all of the Balkan people have a long history of distilling their fruits and I doubt any modern nation can claim they did it first, Hungarian palinka, Romanian rakia, Serbian/Croatian/Polish/etc. Slivovitz are all really the same drink. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.240.132.84 (talk) 02:05, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Blatantly non-NPOV sentences

"The best Slivovice is home made" and "To produce the best brew nothing else is added to the barrel." 71.178.188.220 (talk) 10:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Original Research/POV material

The following content was removed as Original Research/POV and relocated here (rather than be deleted outright):

Fermentation and distillation in Moravia, Czech Republic

Collecting the plums is a family event, when the plums are ripe, the plum tree branches are shaken vigorously causing the plums to drop to the ground. These are collected taken home and put in various barrels, these days usually plastic.

The plums are not crushed, just put as they were picked into the barrels, sometimes squeezed gently, but crushing of kernels is avoided. To produce the best brew nothing else is added to the barrel. Fermentation is natural and continues for a couple of months producing a heady rich mash of fermented fruit.

The next stage is to take the mash to the local distillery, at some time from November on. Some people distill at home, but this is illegal in some countries and can be dangerous as the result might contain methyl alcohol. Most villages in Moravia have their own distillery. In some countries, tax has to be paid on the amount of alcohol produced, but the tax rate is sometimes significantly lower than for commercial products.

The mash is usually distilled twice, firstly in a large vat, and then in a much smaller vat. Distilleries using single distillation with vigorous deflegmation also exist but are generally avoided, as their product is believed to be of worse quality. Traditionally the heating was done using wood, but nowadays natural gas is prevalent. The result is a colorless liquid which is usually watered down to give an alcohol content of around 51%. During the distilling season, distilleries run a non-stop operation almost 24 hours a day, villagers lining up with trailers full of barrels.

A good mash will give around 10% of its volume in finished spirit — perfectly pure, healthy spirit, with a distinct prune aroma, which has medical uses in the home as well as being an extremely potent drink. [End] Wikiuser100 (talk) 22:36, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Kosher for passover

I think this article needs to mention that it is one of the only two hard liquors (the other being vodka made from potatoes) that is kosher for passover. That is one of its main sources of consumption... I guess someone could find a source but it just makes sense of it's one of the only liquors.130.68.193.227 (talk) 05:28, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

This depends on the source, both of the liquor and of the judgment. In traditional recipes, only whiskies are made from grain and therefore should not be allowed; liquors made from all sorts of fruits (including grapes, or course,) rum from molasses, tequila from agave, gin, etc. would all be fine. My sister asked her rabbi if my home made mead would be OK for a seder (she was concerned about the yeast that is introduced, but grape wines require that too) and he said it would be fine; there's no reason that distillation to make a honey liquor should render it trafe. But in reality nowadays, many liquors are made with grain alcohol and flavoring (more's the puty) so they are suspect at best.

But that's where the source of the judgment comes into it. By some rules, when a product is sufficiently processed and "different" from the crop it came from then it may be OK; corn oil, for example, is a matter of great disagreement. So if grain alcohol is distilled multiple times and charcoal filtered to produce a pure neutral spirit (like Everclear) the result would probably be considered OK. Then there's the certification issue. Many Jews, even conservative rabbis (like my sister's and my uncle) consider wine to be OK whether certified or not; my mead, for instance, is certainly not certified. I can only assume that the same goes for liquor. Some, or course, are more cautious for Passover, just as some are year round. Since Jews have no central authority for such matters (there is no Aba in Jerusalem) when you ask 5 "authorities" on matters of kashrut, you’re likely to get 7 answers.

Still, it's quite true that slivovitz is popular during Passover. With many Ashkenazi jews it's popular at rites of passage as well, just as described in the article for Serbs.

Joe Avins (talk) 14:27, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Article unfoundedly written in a Serbian POV

There was a duplicity, so I took the liberty of deleting one of them: Following the claims of several nations to the protected designation of origin, in October 2007 the European Union went for a compromise solution, leaving "slivovitz" as a generic name, and granting individual nations the right to protect the origin with their own adjective.[13] Thus, "Serbian Slivovitz" (Srpska šljivovica) will become Serbia's first certified national brand.[14]

Deleted, obvious nonsense - the slivovitz is obviously a germanized vesion of Czech slivovice [slivovitse] and in http://www.super-import.com/manastirka_sljivovica_d.htm there was no mention of anything like that anyway: The Serbian šljivovica (Шљивовица) of which the English rendering "Slivovitz" also originates from, is the national drink of Serbia and the ethnic Serbs.[28]

Also I must point out that this seems like a Serbian advertisement - it's the only country that has a section saying anything about its traditions. I suggest either writing more about other countries, or rewriting the Serbian part.

I deleted the 3 paragraphs after the slivovitz "etymology" because there was no reason to have them there, as I said this is not an ad:

The Sljivovica has been produced in Serbian Orthodox monasteries for centuries.

The Manastirka from Propkuplje has Fresh ripened organic nature plums, grown only in Prokuplje, are crushed and allowed to ferment. The mash is twice-distilled and aged in oak barrel casks. Hand selected fresh plums are then added to yield more of the fruit taste.

After being aged for at least 10 years Manastirka Sljivovica gets a golden-yellow color and a unique aroma specific for the plums of this region.<ref name="SI"/>

The statement "produced in the Balkans,[4] Bosnia, Croatia,[5][6] Serbia,[7][8] Moravia,[9][10] Czechoslovakia,[11] Hungary[11] or Bulgaria.[11]" is a bit... well... Balkans means Bosnia, Croatia and Serbia; Czechoslovakia does not exist any more (peaceful dissolution into Czech and Slovak republic in 1993) and in the time it was first distilled didn't exist anyway, Moravia is a part of Czech republic.

Some sentences did not make much sense, so I reworded them a bit.

To sum it up, sorry to say that, this article is a mess (even after my corrections). Muflon 83 (talk) 09:26, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Headline of this section is very inappropriate, if Serbs claim that this is their drink it is not nationalism. Nationalism is when someone call this "nationalism" because it is attempt of insulting. I changed headline to "Serbian point of view" in order not to insult anyone. Please respect others.

In reaction to previous comment by a Serbian patriot 213.198.224.17 who doesn't even sign his own comments: I stand by my original assessment. Years have passed and this article still 'makes an impression on the reader' that the drink is undoubtedly from the Balkans and the Czech Republic is part of Southeastern Europe. Also, if someone claims something is of his own nation's origin without substantiating the claim, it does make his action a nationalistic one. I've taken the liberty of looking at your additions to Wikipedia and your view of what consists a nationalism of those not of Serbian origin seems a bit skewed. I.E. you are obviously a racist. Muflon 83 (talk) 19:19, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

On 24.135.131.14 's edits I rolled back recently: I see the reason you can see those edits before mine as a vandalism - a Serbian section has been removed completely, which, obviously, is not a good thing. While the original section was heavily POV, I have put it back with some rewording (deleted unfounded claims). Also deleted some nonexisting/not working references and believe now it should suffice temporarily. I hope this will stop all the fight. Muflon 83 (talk) 07:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Serving Size

The Serbian section states "Serbian Šljivovica is consumed chilled in a special shot glass ... of 0.03 to 0.05 dl." Shouldn't that be either "3 to 5 dl" or "0.03 to 0.05 l"? 0.03 l, which is equal to 3 dl, is just about 1 US oz, but 0.03 dl is less than 5 drops! Being American, I'm aware of but not familiar with the use of dl for serving sizes; is it traditional to use this mathematically incorrect notation? Joe Avins (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

It has since been corrected to 0.3-0.5 dl, i.e. 3-5 cl as would probably be the more usual way of writing it (who drinks hard liquor by the decilitre PER SHOT?). And you've made a decimal error: 1 fluid ounce = 29.6 ml = 2.96 cl = 0.296 dl. That makes a bit more than 3 fl oz to the dl (NOT 3 dl = 1 fl oz). Standard shot sizes of course varies, but the German Wikipedia indicates 2 and 4 cl as standard sizes.

Mojowiha (talk) 15:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Prirodna Sljivovica.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Prirodna Sljivovica.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Finnish?

In linguistic variants section there's Finnish which is basically the standard borrowing translitteration, I don't think majority of Finns know the name or what slivovitz is so I don't see how giving that is relevant to this page. I'm not sure you can even buy slivovitz anywhere in Finland. –Flammie (talk) 14:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Capitalization

In some places in the article, the title word (Slivovitz, sometimes with diacritics) is capitalized. Is there any legitimate reason for that (e.g., is it derived from the name of a city or geographic place)? —BarrelProof (talk) 16:47, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

There shouldn't be any reason since it's a generic category (it's even recorded in EU regulations [3] as a generic name for plum spirits). It's derived from šljiva, meaning plums in Serbian and other Slavic languages. – Phoney (talk) 10:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Slivovitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071117082119/http://www.rjelinek.cz/kosher-vyroba.php?LANG=en to http://www.rjelinek.cz/kosher-vyroba.php?LANG=en
• Added archive https://archive.is/20130731151118/http://www.antyczek.pl/varia/dewocjonalia/butelka-gorzelnia-siedlisko-pejsachowka-antyk-judaica.html to http://www.antyczek.pl/varia/dewocjonalia/butelka-gorzelnia-siedlisko-pejsachowka-antyk-judaica.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606114227/http://www.b92.net/eng/news/economy-article.php?yyyy=2007&mm=09&dd=28&nav_category=98&nav_id=44132 to http://www.b92.net/eng/news/economy-article.php?yyyy=2007&mm=09&dd=28&nav_category=98&nav_id=44132

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)