Talk:Slug and Lettuce/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Greatuser (talk · contribs) Starting review and will comment soon 15:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

• Disambiguated pages Greatuser (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

•  Done I fixed the links Greatuser (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

• Further does not look any more problem, It meets Good article criteria Greatuser (talk) 17:15, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

• Non-reviewer comment: article doesn't seem to meet good article criteria. I have added some points below.

:*"Slug & Lettuce" -> "Slug and Lettuce", the name of the chain. :*Paragraph finishing with "leaving it with only one location in Scotland, and no presence in Wales" needs to finish with a ref.

• "The chain refreshes its menu twice a year, once for spring/summer and once for autumn/winter" - ref?

This statement is not a direct quotation, statistic, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statement that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or contentious material relating to living persons; therefore, according to the Good Article criteria, it does not require a reference. Farrtj (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Articles should always be fully sourced, and I will not permit anyone to pass this unless it is referenced. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

In response to this I have removed the offending sentences.Farrtj (talk) 22:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

• "Most outlets are situated in town and city centre locations" - ref?

As before.Farrtj (talk) 11:24, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

See above. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 16:38, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

• All paragraphs in the Operations section are too short and need to be merged with others.
• In the article, explain the reason why the quote by Zoe Williams is needed or how it is relevant, not just have an unexplained quote.
• Merge short paragraphs in the Reception section with others.
• "the South East" -> "South East England"

• Thanks. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 13:25, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Review list

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: