edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Small-lift launch vehicle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Electron's flag should be USA, not New Zealand, right?

edit

Electron is a launcher built by an American company, Rocket Lab. The first launch site is in New Zealand with a second being builtin in the USA. Should the flag associated with the launcher be of the country who is building the vehicle, not where one of the launch sites sit? Isn't this similar to the Soyuz launches from the Ukraine?

Marc

FAA's Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation 2018 (PDF Pg 144) puts it under US flag as well  Ohsin  17:04, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Technically Rocketlab space systems USA is a US company based in california and the launch pad in NZ is technically US soil.--Patbahn (talk) 21:56, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Atlas D/Atlas 1 series

edit

This article has the Delta 1000 series in here but leaves out the Atlas SM-65 through Atlas-Centaur

It would seem the Atlas B and Atlas-Agena are clearly in family

--Patbahn (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

price discussion

edit

It is pointed out that prices are hard to compare, and that is true, given some 60 years of data, NTL, IMHO we should take the best data, especially with cites and list the price for a mission and the quoted year price. Obviously 60's pricing won't be very meaningful compared to 2005 but, you make the best of it.--Patbahn (talk) 21:58, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Chinese Rockets

edit

I don't see Hyperbola-1, Jielong-1, or OSM-1 on this list of Chinese rockets, either active or retired. However, the following Wikipedia article lists them. It also lists the Kaituozhe as active.

Comparison of orbital launcher families Malhilli (talk) 18:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Suggest we separate active (including in development) and in-active (including retired) into two separate charts.

edit

There are just too many rockets for one chart. Removing those rockets that will no longer fly will allow a new main chart of rockets that are flying or will soon be.

user:mnw2000 13:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC) user:mnw2000 13:42, 24 June 2023 (UTC)Reply