Talk:Small v. United States
Latest comment: 18 years ago by 195.70.48.242 in topic Offensive ruling
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Small v. United States article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Offensive ruling
editSo the SCOTUS ruled that a yankee who committed a murder abroad, even if he is caught on CCTV tape doing the crime, is free to purchase firearms back in the USA? How many more people will be murdered because of this?
The ruling is also greatly offensive to all countries of the world outside the USA. No wonder japanese people are now so hateful towards yankee and want the USN sailors out of Japan. Imagine that GI raping japanese schoolgirls go back to USA and parade in full armament on main street... America is losing friends every minute because of unilateralism and arrogance. 195.70.48.242 14:53, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Axillary
editI don't think that word means what you think it means. See axilla.